|
*** The boycott of Fox News is finally over ***
One of the most shameful
periods of US history has come to an end.
Finally, Barack Obama
found the courage to appear on Fox News and so did Hillary Clinton.
Prior to that, none of them wanted to take the risk of losing the potential support
of the Deranged Left, the loons that get apoplectic when they just hear about Fox News.
Paid and organized by
George Soros, the moveon menagerie, the huffington degenerates, the daylikos cannibals, and other equally beautiful creatures on this planet, had
held the democratic party hostage to their totalitarian instincts,
namely by blackmailing them to NOT appear on Fox News, and by
extension, to communicate to large chunks of independents and people from the right.
For those mediocre copycats of Che Guevara, Fox News is what Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty was for the Soviet politburo. They just couldn't stand the dissenting voice, so they jammed the broadcasts.
Now that Hillary has
nothing to lose (the Deranged Left proved to be hating her either as
much as they hate Bush and Cheney, or even more) she joyfully chatted
on the much despised taboo channel, the forbidden media.
Interestingly, she chose a
TV show, The O'Reilly Factor, a TV phenomenon, not just dominating the
cable news world but
probably responsible for the death of ~500,000
brain cells, per daylikos diarist, per day. For one Keith Olbermann,
that's 1,000,000. Estimations on Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart are
still being made.
For Hillary Clinton, this should be
quite a sweet revenge against the Che Guevara clones of daylikos, the militant outcasts that abused
her on a daily basis in such despicable ways, that it will take another
Honore de Balsac to properly depict the most intricate nuances of
their mental cannibalism.
Yet, it remains
unexplained as to why this information pathology was allowed to have happened in the first
place.
This
incredible practice of ostracizing Fox News was such a blatant
manipulation
of the flows of information, that every remaining Taliban should be
really proud of his intellectual homologues, that overpopulate the base
of the democratic party. What
happened to the concept of the freedom of information and the respect
to different opinions that is a vital component of the modern civilized
society?
In a
society that pretends to be a
showcase of the freedom of information and speech principle such
blackmail should sound surreal. Yet, it was a shameful and despicable
reality. Ain't that amazing?
The democratic candidates,
led by John Edwards, self-censored themselves the same way gutless
citizens in cruel dictatorships, such as North Korea or Saddam's Iraq
use to do it.
The big
difference is that in former Iraq totalitarian thugs cut off
people's tongues in the street to terrorize for real the population.
In the freest country in the world, ideological Talibans threaten their
candidates they will start working against their campaigns. So the
candidates voluntarily self-censor themselves in
order to please and pander to these crazy leftist revolutionaries.
Sheer madness.
It was a pathology that should serve as a
very stern warning what may happen should George Soros's attack dogs
take over.
Either you learn from history yourself, or history teaches you the hard way.
The O’Reilly Learning Curve
The O’Reilly’s Factor (Fox News) has consistently beaten all relevant competition in the cable news for years and years.
That CNN's Larry King was the previous king of cable news is a fact that is probably remembered only by Larry King’s 150-year old grandmother.
That’s how far back in time Ted Turner had had something to be proud of.
Bill O’Reilly might be the king of cable news but is the ideologically driven Left capable of accepting it?
Of course not.
Since facts are facts and his ratings are way above any other cable news show, what do they do?
Move the issue from the total number of viewers to the 25-54 group.
Thus, mediamatters.com, (the entity paid by George Soros to advance his extreme leftist agenda), claimed how O’Reilly is going down, Olbermann (MSNBC) up, and as Olbermann himself boasts, “He [O’Reilly] will be punished severely!” Link
"...pinished severely". Wow!
The guy has the arrogance and confidence of a brigadenfuhrer, no less. He is there to finally impose justice and make everybody happy from now on.
Actually, for the better part of 2007, Olbermann’s results remained pretty pathetic (compared to O’Reilly), even in the 25-54 segment.Link
The big question, however, is, why focus on the 25-54 age group?
Are there any valid reasons for that?
The group is important to advertisers as this is where the bulk of their potential customers are.
Right.
But what are we talking about?
The abilities of O’Reilly and Olbermann to sell advertisers’ products to the public?
or
Their political influence and how they are seen by the politically active segments of US population?
People over 54 will be more interested in politics and much more politically active, electorally or otherwise than the 25-30 group, for example.
Young people don’t watch much politics, neither do they go to vote in large numbers. They mature politically much later.
It takes some time for their brains to become capable of adequately processing the complexities of international affairs, world market tendencies, how a multi-faceted 300-mln entity finds its optimum conditions to exist and operate, etc.
People at 25 are still thinking more with their genitalia, keeping the cerebrum for later days.
Anybody who didn’t know that?
So, while advertisers and TV executives should care about the 25-54 group as financially crucial to them,
politically, it is the total number and the above 54 group that matter much more.
And O’Reilly continues to crush the deranged, ideologically driven propagandists, such as BrigadenFuhrer Olbermann even more impressively in the age segments that actually matter and the total number, of course.
Therefore, by focusing on the 25-54 group, mediamatters, dailykos and the like, demonstrate that they are:
either too dumb to figure out what elements of the demographics matter politically,
or
are just ideological charlatans, who try to jerk off something positive out of their desperate ratings predicament.
Or both.
In the relevant total viewers statistics between Fox News and MSNBC prime time, BrigadenFuhrer Olbermann is "punished" rather "severely" if we are to utilize the language of Olbermann's last recorded wet dream.
Most of the time O'Reilly is a bit over 2mln. viewers, whereas Olbermann's average is at about 750,000.
Thus, 2007 was a 3:1 fiasco for the bizarre radio-transmitter of extreme left bias.
And O'Reilly's ever increasing influence in the cable news stratosphere remains second to none.
| 
MediaWatch
